About the Journal

Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of scientific articles from multidisciplinary disciplines adopted in various community service activities with the aim of community welfare. Articles published in Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) include the results of community service activities related to handling, managing potential, obstacles, challenges, and problems in the community. Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) accepts manuscripts in the field of applied research and downstreaming of quantitative and qualitative community-based scientific research results into a community service format that covers relevant scientific fields including Social; Education; Science; Sports; Language; Business And Economics; Engineering; Health; and Arts.

 

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) accepts manuscripts in the field of applied research and downstreaming of quantitative and qualitative community-based scientific research results into a community service format that covers relevant scientific fields including Social; Education; Science; Sports; Language; Business And Economics; Engineering; Health; and Arts.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) is published two times a year in January and June by Madani Indonesia University

 

Peer Review Process

In the review process, Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) involves writers, editors, section editors, and reviewers. In the review process, Jurnal Insan Madani Mengabdi (JIMM) applies the double-blind review model to maintain confidentiality. Every submitted manuscript is checked first by the editor. If the article meets the focus and scope and the Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM)  writing guidelines, then the document is continued to the reviewer to review the content and novelty of the manuscript. Otherwise, the manuscript will be returned to the author. A minimum of two reviewers will review each document for approximately 8–10 weeks, with the criteria for assessing the manuscript as stated in the Article Assessment Form for Reviewers.

Initial screening. A newly submitted manuscript will be screened by the Editor-in-Chief for its conformity to Jurnal Madani Mengabdi (JMM) scope and basic submission requirements.

Peer-review. If the manuscript passes the initial screening stage, it will be assigned to a handling editor, who will then send it to at least two experts in the relevant field to undergo a double-blind peer review. Manuscripts that fail to pass the initial screening will be rejected without further review.

First decision. A decision on a peer-reviewed manuscript will only be made upon the receipt of at least two review reports. In cases where reports differ significantly, the handling editor will invite an additional reviewer to get a third opinion before making a decision. At this stage, a manuscript can either be rejected, asked for revisions (minor or major), accepted as is, or (if significant changes to the language or content are required) recommended for resubmission for a second review process. If it is accepted, the manuscript will be returned to the submitting author for formatting. The final decision to accept the manuscript will be made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the recommendation of the handling editor and following approval by the board of editors.

Revision stage. A manuscript that requires revisions will be returned to the submitting author, who will have up to three weeks to format and revise the manuscript, following which it will be reviewed by the handling editor. The handling editor will determine whether the changes are adequate and appropriate, as well as whether the author(s) sufficiently responded to the reviewers' comments and suggestions. If the revisions are deemed inadequate, this cycle will be repeated (the manuscript will be returned to the submitting author once more for further revision).

Final decision. At this stage, the revised manuscript will either be accepted or rejected. This decision is dependent on whether the handling editor finds the manuscript to have been improved to a level worthy of publication. If the author(s) are unable to make the required changes or have done so to a degree below Intech's standards, the manuscript will be rejected.